Start with the preview
Start here — today's preview. Watch “De Broglie wavelength | Physics | Khan Academy” from Khan Academy Physics before (or after) this session. The lab will wait. Mostly.
De Broglie wavelength | Physics | Khan Academy
A clear, unhurried blackboard introduction from Khan Academy's physics series: how Louis de Broglie gave matter a wavelength, λ = h/p, and won a Nobel Prize for the idea. Watch for where the formula comes from and how to put numbers into it; Parts 1 to 3 of the lesson take the same road with more history and more precision.
Watch on YouTubeMore from the video vault
AT&T Archives: Matter Waves, Holden and Germer on Wave Nature and the Davisson-Germer Experiment
A classic classroom film made around 1961 by Educational Services Incorporated with two Bell Labs scientists: Alan Holden hosts and narrates, and Lester Germer himself re-creates the famous 1927 experiment he performed with Clinton Davisson. The perfect companion to Part 4: the experiment re-created by one of the first people ever to see electrons diffract.
Watch on YouTubede Broglie’s proposal
Barton Zwiebach presents de Broglie's proposal at the blackboard in MIT's 8.04 Quantum Physics I (Spring 2016). Expect university-level reasoning about how the energy and momentum relations of the photon were extended to every particle; watch it after Parts 1 and 2.
Watch on YouTube- De Broglie wavelength | Physics | Khan Academy — Khan Academy Physics — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTRxuBxttj8
- AT&T Archives: Matter Waves, Holden and Germer on Wave Nature and the Davisson-Germer Experiment — AT&T Tech Channel — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szGJnpNowqw
- de Broglie’s proposal — MIT OpenCourseWare — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnuZx9fZHsU
Today's mission
Dr. Q · cold openWelcome back to the lab, and please stand very still: I am about to measure your wavelength. Last session Niels Bohr told the electron which orbits it may occupy in a hydrogen atom, and never told it why. Today a French aristocrat who first trained as a historian answers him with one line of algebra. If light, which everybody knew was a wave, arrives in particles, then perhaps particles, which everybody knew were particles, travel as waves. Outrageous! Symmetrical! Correct! Three years later, two physicists at a telephone company's laboratory in New York bounced electrons off a nickel crystal and watched them diffract exactly like X-rays. Great Planck's ghost, the electron is a wave. And so, very faintly, are you.
By the end of this session you will be able to:
- Derive a photon's momentum, p = h/λ = E/c, and explain how Compton scattering confirmed it in 1923
- State de Broglie's 1924 hypothesis λ = h/p and use it to calculate wavelengths for electrons, neutrons, molecules and everyday objects
- Explain why a baseball shows no wave behaviour while an electron does, by comparing each wavelength with the structures it meets
- Describe how the Davisson–Germer and G. P. Thomson experiments of 1927 confirmed electron waves, and check the famous 54-volt result
- Show that Bohr's quantization rule is a standing-wave condition, nλ = 2πr, and state where that picture breaks down
- Explain why electron microscopes resolve far finer detail than light microscopes, and describe matter-wave interference with neutrons, atoms and giant molecules
Read it — or listen along
8 parts. Press play on any part and the paragraph being read lights up as Dr. Q speaks.
Light Packs a Punch: The Momentum of a Photon
Chapter 4 showed that light of frequency f is absorbed in whole packets, photons, each carrying energy E = hf, where h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s is Planck's constant. But a particle carries momentum as well as energy: the quantity of motion it hands over in a collision, for ordinary bodies mass times velocity, p = mv. Light has no mass, yet James Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic theory predicted in 1873 that it presses on whatever absorbs it, and around 1900 Pyotr Lebedev in Moscow, and Ernest Nichols and Gordon Hull at Dartmouth College, measured this feeble radiation pressure.
Einstein's relativity explains how a massless thing can push. It links the energy, momentum and mass of anything through E² = (pc)² + (mc²)², where c is the speed of light. For a photon the mass term vanishes, leaving p = E/c. Combine that with E = hf and the wave relation c = fλ, and the momentum depends only on the wavelength: p = h/λ. Shorter waves hit harder. A green photon of 532 nm carries just 1.25×10⁻²⁷ kilogram-metres per second, which is why full sunlight at the ground, about 1,000 watts per square metre, presses on your skin with a pressure you never notice: about 3 millionths of a newton per square metre.
The proof that single photons carry momentum came in 1923. Arthur Compton scattered X-rays from the electrons in graphite and found that the scattered rays had longer wavelengths, by an amount that grew with the scattering angle. No classical wave theory could explain the shift, but a collision could: treat each photon as a particle of momentum h/λ recoiling from an electron like a billiard ball, and conservation of energy and momentum predict the shift exactly. Compton received the 1927 Nobel Prize in Physics. Today solar sails ride on photon momentum, optical tweezers grip living cells with it, and laser cooling brakes atoms with it, one kick at a time.
Watch this part
De Broglie's Audacious Symmetry
Louis de Broglie made an unlikely revolutionary. Born in 1892 into a French aristocratic family of soldiers and statesmen, he took a first degree in history before turning to physics, drawn in by his elder brother Maurice, an accomplished experimenter with X-rays. After wartime service in army radio, working at the transmitter on the Eiffel Tower, he pondered X-rays that behaved like waves in one experiment and like particles in the next, and came to suspect that this doubleness was not a peculiarity of light at all, but a property of everything.
In three short notes to the French Academy of Sciences in 1923, and in his doctoral thesis, defended at the University of Paris on 25 November 1924, he proposed a symmetry. If a light wave comes with particles of momentum p = h/λ, then every particle of matter should come with a wave of wavelength λ = h/p. Read it as a recipe: divide Planck's constant by a particle's momentum and you get the length of its wave, the distance from one crest to the next. Wavelength and momentum are inversely proportional, so doubling the momentum halves the wavelength, and for anything moving much slower than light, λ = h/(mv). This is the de Broglie wavelength, and the wave is called a matter wave.
His examiners were impressed and baffled in roughly equal measure. His supervisor, Paul Langevin, sent a copy to Einstein, who wrote that de Broglie had 'lifted a corner of the great veil'. By de Broglie's own later account, asked at the defence how the idea might be tested, he suggested scattering electrons from a crystal, whose regularly spaced atoms could act as a diffraction grating. Experiment answered three years later, and in 1929 he received the Nobel Prize in Physics 'for his discovery of the wave nature of electrons'.
Watch this part
Why Baseballs Never Diffract
A wave announces itself through diffraction, the spreading of a wave past an edge or through an opening, and through interference, the reinforcement and cancellation where waves overlap, both met in chapter 2. Both are dramatic only when the wavelength is comparable to the openings or obstacles involved: sound, about a metre long, bends round doorways, while light casts sharp shadows of them. So the question for any object is never whether it has a wavelength, since everything with momentum does, but whether that wavelength is comparable to anything it meets.
Take a baseball of mass 0.145 kg thrown at 40 m/s, about 90 miles per hour. Its momentum is 5.8 kilogram-metres per second, so its wavelength is 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s divided by 5.8: 1.1×10⁻³⁴ metres, about 10¹⁹ times smaller than a proton. No slit or crystal could ever diffract it. Slowing it down does not help: to stretch its wavelength to one millimetre, the ball would have to creep so slowly that crossing a single nanometre would take about 500 times the age of the universe. You, at 70 kg strolling at 1.4 m/s, have a wavelength near 7×10⁻³⁶ metres. Big objects obey quantum mechanics too; their waves are simply far too short to show.
Now take an electron, about 10²⁹ times lighter than the ball. Accelerated from rest through 54 volts, it gains 54 electron-volts of kinetic energy and a momentum of 3.97×10⁻²⁴ kilogram-metres per second, so its wavelength is 0.167 nm, comparable to the spacing of atoms in a solid. A crystal is a ready-made diffraction grating for it. For electrons there is a handy shortcut: after acceleration through V volts, λ ≈ 1.226/√V nanometres, good to better than one percent up to about 10,000 volts. Featherweight particles with atom-sized wavelengths: that is why quantum physics rules chemistry and electronics while baseballs follow Newton's parabolas.
Watch this part
1927: The Electron Diffracts
The decisive evidence arrived partly by accident. At the New York laboratory of Western Electric, renamed Bell Telephone Laboratories in 1925, Clinton Davisson had been bouncing electrons off metals since 1919. In 1925 a liquid-air bottle exploded, cracking the vacuum tube and oxidizing the hot nickel target. Davisson and Lester Germer restored it by prolonged heating, which recrystallized the nickel into a few large crystals, and the scattered electrons changed their pattern sharply. After discussions in England with Max Born and others in 1926, Davisson made the work a deliberate test of de Broglie's waves, and early in 1927 he and Germer found sharp electron beams leaving a single nickel crystal at particular angles, just as X-rays do.
Their famous result: electrons accelerated through 54 volts struck the crystal head-on, perpendicular to its surface, and a strong beam came back out at 50° from that perpendicular. The atoms on a nickel surface sit in rows 0.215 nm apart, and such rows act like the lines of a grating: waves from neighbouring rows reinforce one another when the row spacing times the sine of that angle equals a whole number of wavelengths. That gives a measured wavelength of 0.165 nm. De Broglie's formula predicts 0.167 nm. Nineteen beams in all confirmed λ = h/p within the accuracy of the measurements.
Independently, in Aberdeen, George Paget Thomson and his student Alexander Reid fired electrons of 20,000 to 60,000 volts straight through films only about 10⁻⁶ centimetres thick. A photographic plate recorded sharp concentric rings, like those X-rays make passing through a film of tiny crystals, with sizes matching de Broglie wavelengths of 5 to 9 picometres (a picometre is 10⁻¹² metres) to about one percent. When a magnet deflected the beam, the rings moved with it, proving that the pattern was made by charged electrons and not by stray X-rays. Davisson and Thomson shared the 1937 Nobel Prize in Physics 'for their experimental discovery of the diffraction of electrons by crystals'.
Watch this part
Bohr's Rule Becomes a Standing Wave
Here de Broglie's idea pays its first great dividend. In the last chapter Niels Bohr made hydrogen work by decree: the electron may circle the nucleus only where its angular momentum, mass times speed times radius for a circular orbit, is a whole-number multiple of ħ = h/2π. Bohr could not say why; a wave can. A wave running round a closed loop survives only if it joins up smoothly with itself after each lap. If the circumference holds a whole number of wavelengths, crest meets crest and the wave settles into a standing wave, a stable pattern that oscillates in place; if not, successive laps arrive out of step and cancel.
In symbols: if n whole wavelengths fit around an orbit of radius r, then nλ = 2πr. Substitute λ = h/(mv) to get n·h/(mv) = 2πr, and rearrange: m·v·r = n·h/2π = nħ. That is Bohr's rule, no longer a decree but the condition for the electron's wave to fit. In hydrogen's lowest Bohr orbit, of radius 0.0529 nm, the electron moves at 2.19×10⁶ m/s, giving λ = 0.332 nm; the circumference, 2π times 0.0529 nm, is also 0.332 nm, exactly one wavelength. The second orbit holds exactly two wavelengths and the third holds three. Quantization turned out to be the ordinary arithmetic of confined waves.
Watch this part
Electron Microscopes: Seeing With Shorter Waves
Matter waves are also how we see the very small. No microscope can resolve, that is, show as separate, two details much closer together than about half the wavelength it uses, a limit Ernst Abbe worked out in 1873. Visible light spans about 400 to 700 nm, so no conventional light microscope can separate points closer than about 200 nm, while atoms, a few tenths of a nanometre across, lie a thousand times below that. Electrons accelerated through 100,000 volts have a wavelength of about 0.0037 nm, some 150,000 times shorter than green light, and current-carrying coils focus them as glass lenses focus light.
In 1931, at the Technical College in Berlin, the young engineer Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll built the first electron microscope, and they had not yet heard of matter waves. When Ruska learned of de Broglie's thesis that summer, he was at first dismayed that electron microscopes, too, would be limited by a wavelength, then heartened to find that electron waves were about five orders of magnitude shorter than light. By the end of 1933 his second instrument magnified 12,000 times, more than any light microscope could. Siemens began series production in 1939, and Ruska shared the 1986 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Oddly, the wavelength is not what limits electron microscopes. Magnetic lenses suffer aberrations, imperfections that blur the focus, which for decades kept the resolution some fifty to a hundred times coarser than the electron wavelength. Aberration correctors, practical since the late 1990s, changed that: the best instruments now resolve details smaller than 0.05 nm, about 4,000 times finer than the optical limit. Cryo-electron microscopy of flash-frozen biological molecules won the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, and in February 2020 it revealed the atomic structure of the new coronavirus's spike protein.
Watch this part
Neutrons, Atoms and Giant Molecules
Every particle ever tested obeys λ = h/p. Neutrons, the uncharged particles of the nucleus, were first diffracted by crystals in 1936. Slowed in a reactor to the thermal energy of their surroundings, about 0.025 eV, they move near 2,200 m/s with a wavelength of 0.18 nm, ideal for crystals. Because neutrons scatter from nuclei rather than electrons, they reveal hydrogen atoms that X-rays barely see, and because they are tiny magnets they map magnetism; Clifford Shull shared the 1994 Nobel Prize in Physics for developing neutron diffraction. In 1975 Roberto Colella, Albert Overhauser and Samuel Werner even watched gravity shift the interference of neutron waves travelling at different heights.
Whole atoms followed. In 1930 Immanuel Estermann and Otto Stern diffracted helium atoms from a lithium fluoride crystal, and since 1991 atom interferometers have become exquisitely precise sensors of gravity and rotation. Then Vienna went big. In 1999 Anton Zeilinger's group, with Markus Arndt, heated C₆₀, buckminsterfullerene, a football-shaped cage of 60 carbon atoms, to 900 to 1,000 kelvin and sent the molecules at about 220 m/s through a grating of slits 100 nm apart. Their wavelength, 2.5 pm, is almost 400 times smaller than the molecule itself, yet 1.25 metres downstream the detector found a clear diffraction pattern, with side peaks about 30 micrometres from the centre.
The giants kept growing. In 2019 Arndt's group reported interference of molecules made of up to 2,000 atoms, with masses beyond 25,000 atomic mass units. In January 2026 it reported in Nature the interference of sodium clusters containing more than 7,000 atoms each, above 170,000 atomic mass units and about 8 nm across, split by gratings made of ultraviolet light. As of 2026 these are the most massive objects ever sent through a matter-wave interferometer. The push continues, partly to test collapse models, proposals in which superpositions of heavy enough objects fade away on their own.
Watch this part
So What, Exactly, Is Waving?
A water wave is a wave of matter: water itself rises and falls. So is sound, in which air is squeezed and stretched. A matter wave, despite its name, is neither. Nothing material ripples. In every experiment in this chapter, each electron, neutron or molecule arrives at the detector whole, at a single place, and the pattern appears only as many arrivals pile up; chapter 7 will watch electrons build one dot by dot. In 1926 Max Born proposed the reading used ever since: the matter wave is a probability amplitude, a quantity whose squared size, |ψ|², gives the probability of detecting the particle at each place. Chapter 9 makes this precise.
What the amplitude is physically, a real guiding field as de Broglie came to believe or only a tool for predicting outcomes, depends on your interpretation of quantum mechanics, and physicists still debate it; the standard interpretations all make the same predictions. One practical rule holds regardless: interference survives only while nothing records which path a particle took. That is why these experiments run in high vacuum, where a single collision with a gas molecule could betray the path, and why hot C₆₀ still interfered: the two or three infrared photons each molecule emitted in flight had wavelengths around ten micrometres, far too long to reveal which 100-nanometre slit it passed through.
Watch this part
Go deeper on video
18 more videos for this chapter, 12 of them from universities, research institutes and Nobel lectures. The clips under “Watch this part” in the lesson start at the moment that matters.
Key equations
The de Broglie relation
Every particle with momentum p has an associated wave of wavelength h over p. The harder an object pushes, the shorter its wave; the second form holds for speeds well below the speed of light.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| λ | de Broglie wavelength | m |
| h | Planck's constant, 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ (exact) | J·s |
| p | momentum of the particle | kg·m/s |
| m | mass of the particle | kg |
| v | speed of the particle | m/s |
Say it: “lambda equals h divided by p, which equals h divided by m v”
Photon momentum
A photon has no mass but still carries momentum, equal to its energy divided by the speed of light. Shorter wavelengths deliver bigger kicks, which is what Compton saw when X-rays recoiled from electrons.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| p | momentum of one photon | kg·m/s |
| E | energy of one photon, hf | J |
| c | speed of light in vacuum, 299,792,458 (exact) | m/s |
| λ | wavelength of the light | m |
Say it: “p equals E divided by c, which equals h divided by lambda”
Wavelength from kinetic energy
For slow particles, momentum is the square root of twice the mass times the kinetic energy. An electron accelerated from rest through V volts gains kinetic energy e times V, which gives the electron shortcut, good to better than one percent up to about 10,000 volts.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| K | kinetic energy of the particle | J |
| V | accelerating voltage, as a plain number of volts | V |
| e | elementary charge, 1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ (exact); K = eV for an electron | C |
| m | mass of the particle; for an electron, 9.109×10⁻³¹ | kg |
Say it: “lambda equals h divided by the square root of 2 m K; for an electron accelerated through V volts, lambda is approximately 1.226 divided by the square root of V, in nanometres”
Bohr's rule as a standing wave
An electron's wave fits around an orbit only if the circumference holds a whole number of wavelengths. Substituting lambda equals h over m v turns that condition into Bohr's quantized angular momentum.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| n | whole number of wavelengths around the orbit: 1, 2, 3 … | none |
| r | orbit radius | m |
| mvr | angular momentum of a circular orbit | J·s |
| ħ | reduced Planck constant h/2π, 1.0546×10⁻³⁴ | J·s |
Say it: “n lambda equals 2 pi r, which leads to m v r equals n times h over 2 pi, which is n h-bar”
The grating condition
Waves scattered from neighbouring lines of a grating, or from neighbouring rows of atoms on a crystal surface as in Davisson and Germer's experiment, reinforce in directions where their path difference is a whole number of wavelengths. For a wave arriving head-on, the angle is measured from the perpendicular, and the rule is the same for light, X-rays, electrons, neutrons and molecules.
| Symbol | Meaning | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| d | spacing between grating lines or atomic rows | m |
| θ | angle of a bright diffracted beam, measured from the perpendicular to the grating | degrees or radians |
| n | diffraction order: 1, 2, 3 … | none |
| λ | wavelength of the incoming wave | m |
Say it: “d times the sine of theta equals n lambda”
Real numbers, step by step
Cover the steps, try the problem yourself, then reveal the solution one step at a time.
A fastball and an electron
Compare the de Broglie wavelength of a baseball of mass 0.145 kg thrown at 40 m/s with that of an electron accelerated from rest through 54 volts. Which could a crystal, with atoms about 0.2 nm apart, diffract?
Step 1: Baseball momentum: p = mv = 0.145 kg × 40 m/s = 5.8 kilogram-metres per second.
Step 2: Baseball wavelength: λ = h ÷ p = (6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s) ÷ 5.8 = 1.14×10⁻³⁴ metres.
Step 3: Electron kinetic energy: K = 54 eV = 54 × 1.602×10⁻¹⁹ = 8.65×10⁻¹⁸ joules.
Step 4: Electron momentum: p = √(2mK) = √(2 × 9.109×10⁻³¹ kilograms × 8.65×10⁻¹⁸ joules) = 3.97×10⁻²⁴ kilogram-metres per second.
Step 5: Electron wavelength: λ = (6.626×10⁻³⁴) ÷ (3.97×10⁻²⁴) = 1.67×10⁻¹⁰ metres = 0.167 nm. The shortcut agrees: 1.226 ÷ √54 = 0.167 nm.
Step 6: Ratio: the electron's wavelength is about 1.5×10²⁴ times longer than the baseball's.
Baseball: λ ≈ 1.1×10⁻³⁴ metres; electron: λ ≈ 0.167 nm. Only the electron's wavelength is comparable to atomic spacings, so only the electron diffracts
Why it matters: Same formula, same constant; the entire difference between quantum and classical behaviour here comes from the momentum in the denominator.
Checking Davisson and Germer
In 1927 Davisson and Germer sent 54-volt electrons head-on into a nickel surface whose atomic rows are 0.215 nm apart, and found a strong beam coming back at 50° from the perpendicular to the surface. Treat the rows as a diffraction grating in first order and find the measured wavelength. Compare it with de Broglie's prediction, and find the angle de Broglie's value would predict.
Step 1: In first order, the wavelength equals the row spacing times the sine of the angle from the perpendicular.
Step 2: Measured wavelength: the sine of 50° is 0.766, so λ = 0.215 nm × 0.766 = 0.1647 nm, about 0.165 nm.
Step 3: De Broglie's prediction for 54-volt electrons, from Example 1: 0.1669 nm, about 0.167 nm.
Step 4: Difference: (0.1669 − 0.1647) ÷ 0.1669 ≈ 1.3 percent, within the accuracy of the experiment.
Step 5: Predicted angle: its sine is 0.1669 ÷ 0.215 = 0.776, so the angle is about 51°, one degree from the observed 50°.
The diffraction data give a wavelength of about 0.165 nm against de Broglie's 0.167 nm, agreement to about 1 percent
Why it matters: The crystal does for electrons exactly what a ruled grating does for light. Nature supplied a grating with lines a fifth of a nanometre apart, finer than any human could rule.
Fitting waves into hydrogen
In Bohr's model the electron in hydrogen's lowest orbit has radius 0.0529 nm and speed 2.19×10⁶ m/s. Find its de Broglie wavelength and compare it with the circumference. Repeat for the second orbit, of radius 0.212 nm and speed 1.09×10⁶ m/s.
Step 1: First orbit momentum: p = mv = 9.109×10⁻³¹ kilograms × 2.19×10⁶ m/s = 1.99×10⁻²⁴ kilogram-metres per second.
Step 2: First orbit wavelength: λ = (6.626×10⁻³⁴) ÷ (1.99×10⁻²⁴) = 3.32×10⁻¹⁰ metres = 0.332 nm.
Step 3: First orbit circumference: 2π × 0.0529 nm = 0.332 nm, so exactly one wavelength fits: n = 1.
Step 4: Second orbit: λ = (6.626×10⁻³⁴) ÷ (9.109×10⁻³¹ × 1.09×10⁶) = 0.667 nm, while the circumference is 2π × 0.212 nm = 1.33 nm, two wavelengths to within rounding: n = 2.
Step 5: Angular momentum check for n = 1: m·v·r = 1.99×10⁻²⁴ × 5.29×10⁻¹¹ = 1.05×10⁻³⁴ J·s, which is ħ to within rounding.
One wavelength, 0.332 nm, fits the first orbit and two wavelengths, about 0.67 nm each, fit the second, reproducing Bohr's rule m·v·r = nħ
Why it matters: Bohr's mysterious integer n is simply a count of wavelengths around the orbit, although real atoms replace the ring with three-dimensional orbitals.
Same wavelength, wildly different energies
Find the momentum and energy of a green photon of wavelength 532 nm. Then find the speed and kinetic energy of an electron with the same de Broglie wavelength.
Step 1: Photon momentum: p = h ÷ λ = (6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s) ÷ (5.32×10⁻⁷ metres) = 1.246×10⁻²⁷ kilogram-metres per second.
Step 2: Photon energy: E = pc = hc ÷ λ = (6.626×10⁻³⁴ × 2.998×10⁸) ÷ (5.32×10⁻⁷) = 3.73×10⁻¹⁹ joules = 2.33 eV, matching 1240 ÷ 532 from chapter 4.
Step 3: Same wavelength means same momentum, so the electron also has p = 1.246×10⁻²⁷ kilogram-metres per second.
Step 4: Electron speed: v = p ÷ m = (1.246×10⁻²⁷) ÷ (9.109×10⁻³¹ kilograms) = 1.37×10³ m/s, about 1.4 kilometres per second.
Step 5: Electron kinetic energy: K = p² ÷ 2m = (1.246×10⁻²⁷)² ÷ (2 × 9.109×10⁻³¹) = 8.5×10⁻²⁵ joules = 5.3×10⁻⁶ electron-volts.
Both carry a momentum of about 1.25×10⁻²⁷ kilogram-metres per second, but the photon's energy is 2.33 eV while the electron's kinetic energy is only about 5.3×10⁻⁶ electron-volts, some 440,000 times less
Why it matters: λ = h/p is universal; the link between energy and momentum is not. Light obeys E = pc, slow matter obeys K = p²/2m.
What everyone gets wrong
Read the myth, decide whether you believed it, then bust it.
- Myth #1
Matter waves are waves OF matter, like ripples on water: the electron's substance is spread out and sloshing about.
TruthNothing material ripples. In every diffraction experiment each electron, neutron or molecule is detected whole, at a single point, and the wave pattern emerges only from the statistics of many arrivals. In standard quantum mechanics the matter wave is a probability amplitude whose squared size, |ψ|², gives the probability of detection at each place (Max Born, 1926). What that amplitude ultimately is remains a question of interpretation, but no experiment has ever caught a fraction of an electron, and standard quantum mechanics does not treat the wave as electron material spread out like water in a pond.
- Myth #2
Only light has wave properties; particles of matter are just particles.
TruthEverything with momentum has a de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p, and diffraction or interference has been seen for electrons (1927), helium atoms (1930), neutrons (1936), C₆₀ molecules (1999), molecules of 2,000 atoms (2019) and sodium clusters of more than 7,000 atoms (reported in 2026). Everyday objects have wavelengths too; they are just immeasurably short.
- Myth #3
A particle's de Broglie wavelength is its size.
TruthThe wavelength depends on momentum, not on size, and it changes whenever the speed does. A C₆₀ molecule at 220 m/s has a wavelength of 2.5 pm, almost 400 times smaller than the molecule, and it still diffracts. An electron, with no size anyone has ever measured, has a wavelength of 0.167 nm after 54 volts of acceleration.
- Myth #4
A matter wave means the particle zigzags along a wavy path.
TruthThe wavelength is not the wiggle of a trajectory. It describes how the probability amplitude varies in space, the spacing of the crests that make diffraction and interference possible. Standard quantum mechanics assigns the electron no definite path between source and detector at all, and even the pilot-wave interpretation, which does give it one, does not make it zigzag at the de Broglie wavelength.
Your turn at the controls
Welcome to the Matter-Wave Sizer, where we find out how wavy anything is. Pick an object, from an electron, proton, neutron, helium atom or C₆₀ molecule up to a dust grain, a baseball or you, then set its speed, or for the small ones its energy, given as an accelerating voltage for charged particles. The sizer computes the momentum and the de Broglie wavelength, λ = h/p, and marks it on a size ruler running from below the Planck length to ten metres, beside nuclei, atomic spacings, visible light and the object's own size. A diffraction test then aims the wave at a nickel crystal, a nanograting or a doorway, so you can see at once whether anything could make it diffract.
Your tasks
0/4How it connects to the theory
Every readout is a line from the lesson. For a chosen speed the sizer uses p = mv, and for a chosen energy p = √(2mK), each with Einstein's correction near the speed of light; either way, λ = h/p, and the diffraction test applies d·sin θ = nλ. Hitting the Davisson–Germer target means reproducing the 0.167 nm wavelength that a nickel crystal diffracted in 1927, the neutron target is the wavelength that made neutron crystallography possible, and the C₆₀ target is the 1999 Vienna experiment. Watch how the targets cluster near atomic sizes while the baseball and you sink to the bottom of the ruler: that gap, of more than twenty powers of ten, is the whole reason the everyday world looks classical.
Matter-Wave Sizer: How Wavy Are You? loads as you scroll down.
Make it stick
Two hooks, one for the formula and one for the evidence. The formula: 'Push hard, wave small.' Read λ = h/p literally, with Planck's tiny h on top and the push, the momentum p, underneath: the harder an object pushes, the smaller its wave, which is why fast, heavy things look classical and slow, light things look quantum. The evidence, in the order nature confessed it: Every Atom Now Feels Giddy. Electrons (1927, Davisson and Germer, and Thomson), Atoms (1930, Estermann and Stern's helium), Neutrons (1936, crystal diffraction), Fullerenes (C₆₀, 1999), Giants (2,000-atom molecules in 2019 and 7,000-atom sodium clusters in 2026). Whenever a question asks whether something has a wave, walk the ladder: the answer is always yes, and the only real question is whether h/p is big enough to see.
Think of every moving object as humming a note whose pitch is set by its momentum: push it harder and the pitch rises, which means a shorter wavelength. An electron hums in the deep bass, with wavelengths as long as atoms are wide, so a crystal can hear it and answers with a diffraction pattern. A baseball hums at an unimaginably high pitch, about 10⁻³⁴ metres, far beyond the range of any instrument that could ever exist. Bohr's orbits are the notes that fit the atom, like a round that must come back in tune after one lap. Where it breaks: nothing material vibrates, no air, no medium and no smeared-out matter. The hum is a probability amplitude whose square gives detection odds, every particle is always detected whole at one spot, and real atoms are three-dimensional, so the singing ring is a cartoon.
The whole chapter in one lineEverything with momentum has a wavelength, λ = h/p: atom-sized for electrons, absurdly tiny for baseballs, and confirmed from electrons to giant molecules.
Flashcards
Saved on this device. Knew it moves a card up a box; still learning sends it back to box 1. Boxes 4–5 count as mastered.
Play it into long-term memory
Match the vocabulary, then take the Quiz Show. Score 70% or better to tick it off your checklist.
Vocab Match
Match each term to its definition, against the clock.
- 12 pairs in 2 rounds
- 100 points a match, more on a streak
- −25 per mistake · speed bonus each round
- Finish with 3 mistakes or fewer to win
Dr. Q's Quantum Quiz Show
Welcome, contestants! 8 questions, 30 seconds each, and one mad scientist judging you, lovingly. Answer fast for a speed bonus; answer right in a row and your points multiply.
- 100 per answer
- +100 speed bonus
- ×2 streak bonus
Prove it on paper
Answer every question, check your work, and read the explanations — the stretch challenge is for the truly mad.
Work through these on paper before checking the answers. Use λ = h/p, p = mv, p = √(2mK), p = E/c = h/λ and d·sin θ = nλ. Take h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J·s, c = 2.998×10⁸ m/s, 1 eV = 1.602×10⁻¹⁹ joules, electron mass 9.109×10⁻³¹ kg, neutron mass 1.675×10⁻²⁷ kg, and 1 atomic mass unit = 1.661×10⁻²⁷ kg. Show units at every step.
Part A
Vocabulary
- Matter wave
- The wave associated with any moving particle of matter, also called a de Broglie wave; its squared amplitude gives the probability of detecting the particle.
- De Broglie wavelength
- The wavelength of a particle's matter wave, λ = h/p, equal to Planck's constant divided by the particle's momentum.
- Momentum
- The quantity of motion an object carries and conserves in collisions: p = mv for slow bodies, p = E/c = h/λ for photons.
- Radiation pressure
- The push exerted by light on a surface that absorbs or reflects it, a consequence of photon momentum.
- Compton scattering
- The lengthening of an X-ray's wavelength when it scatters from an electron, explained in 1923 as a particle collision in which the photon carries momentum h/λ.
- Diffraction
- The spreading and patterning of a wave as it passes edges, openings or regularly spaced obstacles comparable in size to its wavelength.
- Diffraction grating
- A regular array of lines, slits or rows of atoms that sends a wave into bright beams at angles where d·sin θ = nλ.
- Standing wave
- A wave pattern that oscillates in place without travelling, possible only when a whole number of half- or full wavelengths fits the confining space.
- Resolution
- The smallest separation at which an instrument can show two details as distinct; for a microscope, roughly half the wavelength used at best.
- Thermal neutron
- A neutron slowed to the thermal energy of its surroundings, about 0.025 eV and 2,200 m/s, with a wavelength near 0.18 nm.
- Fullerene
- A closed cage molecule of carbon; C₆₀, buckminsterfullerene, is a football-shaped cage of 60 carbon atoms about a nanometre across.
- Probability amplitude
- The quantity a matter wave describes; its squared size, |ψ|², gives the probability of finding the particle at each place.
Part B
Questions
Auto-checked except short answers, which you mark yourself.
- Question 1.Multiple choice
According to de Broglie, which property of a moving particle determines its wavelength?
- Question 2.Multiple choice
Why did electron diffraction need a crystal rather than the ruled gratings used for light?
- Question 3.Multiple choice
What mainly limits the resolution of a modern transmission electron microscope?
- Question 4.True or false
Only light shows wave properties; particles of matter such as electrons and atoms never diffract.
- Question 5.True or false
In the 1999 C₆₀ experiment, each molecule was detected whole at a single place, and the diffraction pattern appeared only after many molecules had arrived.
- Question 6.True or false
If a slow electron's speed is doubled, its de Broglie wavelength is halved.
- Question 7.Fill in the blank
In de Broglie's explanation of Bohr's atom, the circumference of an allowed orbit holds a whole number of electron .
- Question 8.Fill in the blank
A photon's momentum equals its energy divided by the .
- Question 9.Short answer
Explain why a thrown baseball shows no detectable wave behaviour even though de Broglie's relation applies to it.
- Question 10.Short answer
A friend says an electron's matter wave is the electron's material spread out like a ripple on a pond. Using evidence from diffraction experiments, explain what is wrong.
- Question 11.Calculation
An electron is accelerated from rest through 150 volts. Find its kinetic energy in joules, its momentum and its de Broglie wavelength. Check with the electron shortcut.
This one asks for more than one value — give each, with its units.
- Question 12.Calculation
A thermal neutron moves at 2,200 m/s. Find its de Broglie wavelength and its kinetic energy in electron-volts. Is it suitable for studying crystals whose atoms are about 0.2 nm apart?
This one asks for more than one value — give each, with its units.
- Question 13.Calculation
A C₆₀ molecule (mass 720 atomic mass units) travels at 220 m/s toward a grating whose slits are 100 nm apart. Find its de Broglie wavelength, the angle of the first-order diffraction peak, and how far that peak lies from the central peak on a detector 1.25 metres beyond the grating.
This one asks for more than one value — give each, with its units.
- Question 14.Calculation
A 5.0 milliwatt green laser (532 nm) shines on a perfectly absorbing target. Find the momentum of one photon, the number of photons arriving per second, and the force on the target.
This one asks for more than one value — give each, with its units.
Part C · optional, dangerous, extremely rewarding
Mad scientist challenge
Braking an atom with light. A sodium atom (mass 3.82×10⁻²⁶ kg) leaves an oven at 600 m/s and flies head-on into a laser beam of wavelength 589 nm, tuned so that the atom absorbs its photons. (a) Find the atom's de Broglie wavelength. (b) Find the momentum of one photon and the change in the atom's speed each time it absorbs one. (c) Each absorbed photon is soon re-emitted in a random direction. Explain why absorptions slow the atom while emissions, on average, do not speed it up again, and estimate how many absorptions are needed to stop it. (d) Show that an atom moving at exactly the speed change found in (b) has a de Broglie wavelength equal to the laser's wavelength, and explain why this had to be so.
Recap & sign-off
Key takeaways
- Photons carry momentum, p = h/λ = E/c, confirmed in 1923 when Compton scattered X-rays from electrons like colliding particles
- In 1923 and 1924 Louis de Broglie proposed the reverse symmetry: every particle has a wavelength λ = h/p, an idea that won the 1929 Nobel Prize
- Wave behaviour shows only when λ is comparable to the structures involved: about 10⁻³⁴ metres for a baseball, but 0.167 nm, the size of atomic spacings, for a 54-volt electron
- In 1927 Davisson and Germer diffracted electrons from a nickel crystal and G. P. Thomson sent them through thin films, both matching λ = h/p; they shared the 1937 Nobel Prize
- Bohr's rule m·v·r = nħ is the condition nλ = 2πr for the electron's wave to fit around an orbit, a heuristic later replaced by three-dimensional orbitals
- Electron microscopes exploit picometre wavelengths; limited by lens aberrations rather than wavelength, the best now resolve below 0.05 nm, thousands of times finer than conventional light microscopes
- Neutrons, atoms, C₆₀ (1999), 2,000-atom molecules (2019) and 7,000-atom sodium clusters (2026) all interfere; the wave is a probability amplitude, and every particle is detected whole
Dr. Q signs offSo there is the great symmetry: light arrives as particles, matter travels as waves, and Planck's constant sets the exchange rate between them. Next session we take the most famous experiment in physics and run it one particle at a time. Two slits, a single electron in flight, and dots on a screen that slowly assemble into stripes no single dot could explain. Bring your detector and your nerve. Dr. Q, signing off.
Your chapter checklist
Tick these off in any order. It's a guide, not a law of physics — you can mark the chapter complete whenever you're ready.
- Listen to the whole lesson (not yet)Or read it all — but the voice is more fun.
- Win the lab challenge (not yet)Matter-Wave Sizer: How Wavy Are You?Go to the lab
- Score 70% or more on the Quiz Show (not yet)Six to eight questions, no penalties for guessing.Take the quiz
- Check your worksheet (not yet)Answer, check, and read the explanations.Open the worksheet
Sources & further reading
- HyperPhysics (Georgia State University): Wave Nature of the Electron · hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu
- NobelPrize.org: Clinton Davisson, Nobel Lecture, The Discovery of Electron Waves (1937) · nobelprize.org
- NobelPrize.org: Ernst Ruska, Nobel Lecture, The Development of the Electron Microscope and of Electron Microscopy (1986) · nobelprize.org
- M. Arndt et al., Wave–particle duality of C60 molecules, Nature 401, 680 (1999) · doi.org
- S. Pedalino et al., Probing quantum mechanics with nanoparticle matter-wave interferometry, Nature 649, 866 (2026) · doi.org