In the course

Supports Chapter 9

Keep watching

Related videos

10 videos · 3 h 12 min

  • Explainer · YouTube

    Quantum Wavefunction | Quantum physics | Physics | Khan Academy

    Khan Academy

    Khan Academy's beginner introduction to what the quantum wavefunction is, how to use it and where it comes from. Watch for how ψ is turned into probabilities, the recipe that Parts 2 and 3 make exact.

  • Explainer · YouTube

    Quantum Wave Functions: What's Actually Waving?

    The Science Asylum

    Nick Lucid asks the question at the heart of Part 1 and Part 6, what exactly is waving, and ties the wavefunction to probability and statistics. A lively second pass on what the wavefunction is, and what it is not.

  • Explainer · YouTube

    Wavefunction Properties, Normalization, and Expectation Values

    Professor Dave Explains

    Professor Dave on what wavefunctions are, then how to normalize them and calculate expectation values: the recipes of this section and of Part 4. It assumes you have met operators and picks up bra-ket notation and inner products along the way, chapter 14's language, so treat normalization and expectation values as the payoff.

  • Explainer · YouTube

    Interference in quantum mechanics

    Looking Glass Universe

    A six-minute Looking Glass Universe lesson on the rule of quantum mechanics behind much of its strangeness: interference. Keep this section's callout beside it: probabilities can only add, but amplitudes can point opposite ways and cancel.

  • Lecture · YouTube

    Multiplying By A Global Phase Doesn't Make A Difference: Lecture 5.5 of Quantum Computation at CMU

    Ryan O'Donnell

    A short segment of Ryan O'Donnell's Carnegie Mellon course on quantum computation (15-859BB, Fall 2018), posted on his own channel and devoted to the claim in this section's first paragraph: multiplying a state by a global phase changes nothing you can measure. It is written for qubits rather than ψ(x), the same argument in vector form; relative phase, as the section shows, is another matter.

  • Explainer · YouTube

    Is The Wave Function The Building Block of Reality?

    PBS Space Time

    The title is this section's closing question, and the episode's answer is objective collapse: theories that treat the wavefunction as real and add a physical collapse to explain why big things never show quantum strangeness. It is one more answer beside the many-worlds and pilot-wave views the section names; chapter 22 weighs them all.

  • Lecture · MIT

    Lecture 3: The Wave Function

    MIT OpenCourseWare · Allan Adams · 2013

    Allan Adams's MIT 8.04 lecture introduces the wavefunction as the fundamental description of a quantum system, states the probability rule and normalization, shows why a wave of definite momentum is equally likely to be found anywhere, and restates superposition and uncertainty in the language of wavefunctions. A university-level companion to Parts 1 to 3; expectation values arrive in his next lecture.

  • Lecture · MIT

    Interpretation of the wavefunction

    MIT OpenCourseWare · Barton Zwiebach

    An eight-minute segment of MIT 8.04 (Spring 2016) on what the wavefunction means: Born's probability interpretation, stated on the blackboard. Compare his notation with this section's recipe, density |ψ(x)|² times a width gives a probability.

  • Lecture · MIT

    Normalizable wavefunctions and the question of time evolution

    MIT OpenCourseWare · Barton Zwiebach

    Zwiebach asks which wavefunctions can be normalized at all and whether a normalized wavefunction stays normalized as time passes: the last paragraph of this section, done properly. It looks ahead to the Schrödinger equation of chapter 10.

  • Interview · Institute for Quantum Computing

    Born to Rule - Dr. Urbasi Sinha explains the triple-slit experiment

    Institute for Quantum Computing · Urbasi Sinha

    Urbasi Sinha, then a postdoctoral fellow at Waterloo's Institute for Quantum Computing, explains the triple-slit experiment that put Born's rule on trial, the 2010 test this section describes. The logic to keep in mind: squaring sums of amplitudes produces only pairwise interference, so a genuine three-path term would break the rule.